Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @tokenterminal

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @tokenterminal

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    15. sij

    has been updated to include new metrics and the UI has been improved to make different categories of metrics clearer. Here are some quick explanations about the metrics: (thread below) 👇

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. prije 15 sati

    At this point, P/E ratio contains some noise since holders are not optimizing for earnings. However, long-term P/E and other cash-flow metrics are the right measures for token holders to use to understand their investments.

    Poništi
  3. 2. velj

    To those wondering about staking yields and earnings calculations on . The money has to come from somewhere, 2 options: - Tx fees (money from outside) = Earnings. - Inflation (money from diluting non-active holders) + Tx Fees = Adjusted-yield.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. 2. velj

    Never understood "the problem is UX" arguments. Generally, everything that works in DeFi is already much better than traditional finance. It's just about building more of it.

    Poništi
  5. 31. sij

    Bigger point: barrier to try new Web3 services is super low (once you are setup with the basics). This is a notable UX advantage. No need to signup or make deposits. Forcing users to buy a token to use your service ruins that unique advantage

    Poništi
  6. 31. sij

    If one could just connect a Web3 wallet and pay with , it would be really great. Currently stuck on "buy before being able to use this app". MoE tokens are so 2017 and kill UX.

    Poništi
  7. 31. sij

    Since December 1st 2019, 0.56% of all supply has been burned. It took over 700 days to burn the first 0.56% of the supply after launched in December 2017.

    Poništi
  8. 30. sij
    Poništi
  9. 30. sij

    Who wants to have the next Norwegian sovereign wealth fund? Allocate 1% into tokens to own a part of Internet-native services. Railroads of future financial infrastructure.

    Poništi
  10. 30. sij

    Caveat: there are a million nuances to consider here, and it may just be that Ethereum is so valuable that there will be no issue in securing it. Cosmos is interesting though because its economic model is structurally different. 9/9

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 30. sij

    ATOMs are not money, they are a piece of capital to earn transaction fees. Arguably, other L1 tokens are already this and fighting against it. 8/x

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 30. sij

    From a user perspective security for token transfers, using smart contracts, and all that good stuff can be provided by an insurance/options market. == Risk will be priced into assets. 7/x

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 30. sij

    This leads to Cosmos, which does not provide security for applications. Instead, applications are in charge of their own security (own set of validators, pooled security zones etc.). Cosmos simply passes messages between chains. It does not assume they are secure. 6/x

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 30. sij

    What if L1s are not able to hold a monetary premium? Then the security only comes from value of tx fees for trustless computation. In fact, a MP may not even make sense. If you can program anything on a L1 chain, you should be able to program a better MP-capture money. 5/x

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 30. sij

    To credit Bitcoin, that community has fought to protect the monetary premium of BTC. You may have noticed many Ethereum people recently rise up to defend ETH's monetary premium. 4/x

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 30. sij

    In practice, L1s that act as a shared security pool for applications must have a monetary premium to secure the everything built on top. Simply, if becomes too valuable compared to Ethereum, Ethereum becomes the most vulnerable point to the system. 3/x

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 30. sij

    The idea has been that L1s are valuable, because of a monetary premium that they will gain because.. well BTC & ETH have become quite valuable. Money is likely the most valuable application. Thus, even a small chance of success to get a piece of the pie is justified. 2/x

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 30. sij

    To start, the joke that VCs have wasted money misguidedly into L1 projects trying to find the next Ethereum killer is somewhat true. It's extremely difficult to compete against NFX because Ethereum's design space is unlimited. 1/x

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 30. sij

    A thread to communicate security model, and why it's interesting and different compared to most other L1 projects. TLDR; Cosmos changes the economic assumptions that other blockchains make, to an arguably more efficient model. Thread 👇.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 29. sij

    The blockchain ecosystem is quickly moving towards better metrics. Good job here . is happy to contribute to the push forward.

    Poništi
  21. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    This is a great summary of the "cost of corruption" and "profit from corruption" of an oracle. Watch talk about the importance of this guarantee and how it fits into our vision for decentralized financial contracts:

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·