The horror of trying to find actual information in specifications and dev networks. So far MS is more helpful than W3C and Moz combined.
-
-
@ppk working on something to help alleviate these issues. Would love to hear more about your use case.0 retweets 0 likes -
@tobie I want a list of stuff I need to test for a DOM CSS (OM) test suite. It's getting harder and harder to find that kind of information.0 retweets 0 likes -
-
@tobie Methods and properties with a little bit of explanation. Specs used to be decent that way, but nowadays they're gibberish.0 retweets 0 likes -
-
@tobie Just a quick description + code example. Especially a code example. I don't care about webIDL, but I know W3C does.0 retweets 0 likes -
-
@ppk I've always wondered what could make WebIDL more palatable to devs, so that missing examples wouldn't be so much of an issue.
-
-
@tobie Don't do it. Do both. Two target audiences, two types of examples/clarifications.0 retweets 3 likes -
- View other replies
-
@tobie Then web devs will turn elsewhere for explanations. But a simple code example would suffice.0 retweets 0 likes -
-
@tobie@ppk I don't consider them as primary audience, hence I front load the web developer advice e.g. https://specs.webplatform.org/html-aria/webspecs/master/ …0 retweets 0 likes -
@stevefaulkner well, accessibility specs are a lot more targeted at authors so that somewhat explains it.@ppk0 retweets 0 likes -
@tobie@ppk partially, am planning on redoing the elements/attributes of HTML... & work with other spec editors e.g. http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/custom/#semantics …0 retweets 0 likes
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Peter-Paul Koch
Tobie Langel
Steve Faulkner