Here’s a Venn diagram about feminism to start off your 2019.
@choo_ek @DrJenGunter @TakedownMRAs @emrazz @yourfeminstbosspic.twitter.com/OWnEkVAiNL
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I support equality but let’s be real. Many feminists including some writing articles in major medical journals fall within the circle on the right if not a hybrid of the 2. Many women will agree as well
you have not answered the question. What is your statement “you must be married to a feminist” supposed to mean? The implication by the manner in which you use the term is that you view such as a negative or that a man could not, individually, be a feminist.
That’s an absurd position. If you support complete equality between genders, then you are a feminist. You either believe complete equality, and are a feminist, or you believe in inequality. Which side of the line do you fall on?
Many feminist groups emulate a man-hating agenda filled with an endless list of complaints about the “evil” patriarchal system. It’s just not productive
Again, you have not answered the question. Are you being intentionally obtuse?
Perhaps Dr. Geria has seen too many instances where these so called “feminists” venture way to far into “misandry”. Also, many “feminists” are so caught up in their beliefs that they attack other women who don’t share their feelings about certain issues. It happens quite often.
1) He still has not answered the question. 2) Even a few loud voices who claim to be a part of a particular social movement do not define the movement, nor do you get to define the movement, the definition is as stated.
I’m not sure why the question needs to be answered. According to your definition, you advocate for the rights of women if you are a feminist. Therefore, your wife would likely be a feminist as well. Married couples often share similar values. Soooo
Egalitarian is equality. Feminism is gynocentric. Equal opportunity is good. Feminism has been hijacked by extremists and now used to attack men at University and in the workplace.
You say gynocentric as if the term - or being concerned with equality as related to women and on the basis of gender equality - is inherently negative. There can be multiple approaches to achieving equality, and men and women are yet to be made socially or legally equal.
You are out of touch here, women have 100% the legal rights as men, and then additional rights on top of that. Additional rights include lenient treatment in courts and favourable treatment in family courts. Stop treating women as victims. It won’t wash.
I'm not implying victimization here, just demonstrating that just because you believe something to be true does not, in fact, make it true.
Everything I’ve said is supported by data and research. This isn’t a hypothetical debate. I don’t believe it because it feels right, I believe it because the data supports it. You believe wage gap is real right?
That would be egalitarianism. Not feminism. Certainly not as currently practiced.
Read the definition and try again.
Yes, the definitions of feminism and egalitarianism very much overlap. What is your point?
That modern feminism no longer meets its claimed definition and is redundant as you define it, since we have egalitarianism. I don't see the pursuit of positive discrimination, special laws etc and the blocking of egalitarian legislation or events as very egalitarian.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.