You must be married to a feminist
-
-
-
I am a feminist. I was raised by two feminists. I am married to a feminist. I’m not sure what you’re implying here. We should all be feminists and support equality.
-
I support equality but let’s be real. Many feminists including some writing articles in major medical journals fall within the circle on the right if not a hybrid of the 2. Many women will agree as well
-
you have not answered the question. What is your statement “you must be married to a feminist” supposed to mean? The implication by the manner in which you use the term is that you view such as a negative or that a man could not, individually, be a feminist.
-
That’s an absurd position. If you support complete equality between genders, then you are a feminist. You either believe complete equality, and are a feminist, or you believe in inequality. Which side of the line do you fall on?
-
Many feminist groups emulate a man-hating agenda filled with an endless list of complaints about the “evil” patriarchal system. It’s just not productive
-
Again, you have not answered the question. Are you being intentionally obtuse?
-
Perhaps Dr. Geria has seen too many instances where these so called “feminists” venture way to far into “misandry”. Also, many “feminists” are so caught up in their beliefs that they attack other women who don’t share their feelings about certain issues. It happens quite often.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Lmao!!!!
-
Weird, I don’t find pushing for equality for all to be particularly funny when we have yet to achieve such as a society. Interesting that you do...
-
That's not what we find funny. It's the self righteousness. It's wonderful to see you denounce the misandrists who wave the feminist banner, but to deny they exist at all is at least uninsightful if not dishonest.
-
There is no self righteousness involved in demonstrating facts. These two definitions do not in any way overlap. Though your comment about self righteousness certainly displays your own.
-
Ahhhh of course, definition, concepts and theory are more important then facts. It does not matter reality does not have the slightest resemblance to theory.
-
The facts are that being a feminist does not make one a misandrist, and that being a misandrist does not make one a feminist. Feminism is not misandry, and that misandry is not feminism. This isn’t hard.
-
Being an ER doc does not make one a mountain biker, and being a mountain biker does not make one an ER doc. And yet there are people who are both.pic.twitter.com/b61uvX3x6H
-
Yes, but one does not cause the other, nor define the other.
- 18 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I really like that it implicitly defines TERFs as not feminist. Which is smart.
-
Yep. Feminists with exclusionary views are not actually feminists.
-
Wow, there's a whole lot of 'jury' out on that. I'm noticing it is a very, very hot topic in Britain. There seems to be a concern of safety for some women regarding trans-women.
-
Those people can support equality for non-trans women only, if that is how they feel; however, that is not true feminism.
-
> true feminism > true Scotsman

-
Is someone keeping a tally or Google sheet somewhere we can use as a handy reference please? 'Cause lots and lots of people calling themselves feminists despise transgenderism, and argue it is feminism that DICTATES this perspective. Wymmyns club only for wymmyn-born.
-
You say that specifically EXCLUDES them as feminists. Don't want to disbelieve a woman though, regardless of contradictory perspectives. Oh....what to do....what to do...
-
This should provide an adequate explanationhttps://twitter.com/emrazz/status/1081212342854144001?s=21 …
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.