Activists who brought the case, including @JolyonMaugham, say they lodged it in the Scottish courts as England's High Court wasn't sitting in August.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Justice Secretary now intervenes to disagree with sources in No10. Must also be said that not everyone in Downing Street agrees with suggestion that Scots judges might be biased, and a fairly heavy distancing is now underwayhttps://twitter.com/RobertBuckland/status/1171743709148454913?s=20 …
Show this thread -
Now the circle completes. The PM’s official spokesman also now contradicts No10 sources: “The Prime Minister has total confidence in the independence of the judiciary”. So that’s clear.
Show this thread -
Uh oh. While saying he believes judges are impartial, Business minister Kwazi Kwarteng tells
@afneil: "Many Leave voters up and down the country are beginning to question the impartiality of the judges. They’re saying, 'why are they getting involved in politics?'"Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Executive vs Judiciary does not end well. Accusations of political bias are outrageous.
-
Parliament itself had the normal measures available to it if it felt the government were behaving inappropriately - a vote of no confidence or a GE, and they refused to take them for their own political reasons. This is a political argument and doesn't belong in the courts.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
ah! blaming the Judges........that'll go down well.
-
The Daily Mail probably compositing it’s headline now: ‘Traitors’.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Johnson lied to the Queen. He’s not going to worry about lying to the rest of us.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.