Here's my shot: when AT&T announces their new Tweetar service, it means they can't limit Twitter to 5kbps to ensure their "service stability."https://twitter.com/crucially/status/933067589529432064 …
-
Exactly, the answer is to switch provider, except you can’t. Net neutrality doesn’t solve that, it’s a smoke screen. Also doesn’t apply to cell service.
Sure it does. Some cell service providers have towers in places others don't. I'm from Alaska and we didn't even have AT&T until late 2000s. Not even sure if Sprint or Verizon are up there (I moved away). There are local carriers.
-
-
And you can't argue that because a circumstance doesn't affect a percentage of internet traffic it therefore doesn't matter. It still matters. FWIW, I don't think Title II is the best solution, but I'd rather refine regulations than remove them wholesale.
-
The people I've read in the last few months supporting this all attack the same edge arguments. Provider availability. Rural adoption. Tiered pricing. But I have yet to hear a response to my concern. (1/?)
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
What’s messed up is that one carrier can pay to get another carriers towers removed
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.