If c# switch-case statements can't fall through anyhow, why require a break keyword after each case?
-
Doesn't the next case or close bracket of the switch imply the end of the case anyway? Break should only be required to break early.
Hoping someone smarter than me knows something I don't about this. #csharp #programming
-
-
Shouldn't that be #c# ?
-
If it actually worked, I would've. =P
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
You can use return, or goto case, or an inifite loop and not have the break. https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/06tc147t.aspx …
-
but why isn't the break just assumed at the end of each case, if nothing else is present?
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
It's to prevent people with a c programming background from expecting fall through to work.
-
A compile time error is better then unexpected results. C# is very much about making things very clear.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.