After spending the past two weeks dealing with color (tonemapping, gamma correction, blending, interpolation, etc) this is the conclusion I have come to.pic.twitter.com/ScuUGliPDe
Näytä tämä ketju
-
I mean what could go wrong with attempting to replicate a continuous spectrum of frequencies by using three channels that attempt to stimulate three different types of nerves in an equivalent way. :p
Even if that was somehow done perfectly, (almost) everyone would still do it wrong. Even excusing the approximations made for light calculations in real-time rendering, still (almost) everyone does it wrong.
-
-
The end-user's monitor is always some screwed-up tone map anyway. And let's not go into TVs that look at the ambient light and adjust their tone map dynamically. Now you know how sound people feel when people say "everybody's got a 5.1 system, right?"
-
Try on phones where the device will be moved from a pitch black room to direct sunlight on a bright day, with an adaptive white point :p
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
If it’s all so wrong how is it that I can calibrate a TV camera, point it at an object and looking on a correctly calibrated monitor the colours looks remarkably similar (within the constraints of the physics of LCD/OLED displays). In my world of film & TV colour models do work.
-
You used the c word. Most people in the real world people are using default settings on their TV / monitor. If they’ve done anything, it’s probably to set the color to some sort of Vivid preset where everyone’s skin looks like they have terrible sun burn.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.