Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I *had* been doing this forever, but I've noticed that more and more, I'm decoupling geometry from shading and don't recommend this practice anymore. Especially as mesh-shaders come in, I think the two phases are separable and should be "mix-and-matched" more easily
I haven’t used mesh shaders yet. In what way do they impact the design choice, aside from being another stage in the pipeline?
Hmm mainly, I've been finding the cross-section of what's being shared from stage to stage is shrinking. Many studios I've worked with have had thousand+ lines of code in a single shader file, so I've found that just separating them (grouping within directories) helps my sanity
What holds me up here is explicit bindings. Sure, vertex shader may rarely, if ever, use the same buffers/textures as the fragment shader, but they still have to agree on binding. No overlapping, for instance. If spread across files, how do they all agree?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
