Two polls coming. I'm curious about the same question but from two different perspectives. When you are programming, *of these choices*, what is most important *to you*?
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Accessing an object after its lifetime has ended is in no way a strawman. You could argue it's slideware and over simplified, but it's the class of bug people deal with every day. If the memory has not yet been reused, it will appear to work.
For the purposes of arguing whether a programmer/company desires correctness (no UB), it's very strawman. Most companies would desire avoiding your example, but would be perfectly fine with mine.
-
-
If it's *all* UB vs perf, perf wins IMO. If you allow UB that I have tested on all hardware I will deploy on and it does the desired behavior, then correctness wins.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
That example of mine was specifically in response to a question about how code can appear to work but be incorrect on closer examination
-
BTW: there may be followers of mine who don't know that this is Undefined Behavior (UB) vs any number of other possible decryptions of the acronym.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.