Had the weirdest thought today. Pointers are often difficult to teach in c/c++ but they’re basically like a tweet? Or rather, you could think of memory as a tweet. And when you share someone else’s tweet, you’re pointing to it.
Ie, why would you sit and wait for the washer to be done before moving it to the dryer? You’d go do something else in the mean time. Likewise, why would you sit around waiting for a file to load?
-
-
That’s a pretty “well duh” example, but the point is that the more you understand the tasks to do, the better you can interleave them and maximize productivity. I bet women in traditional roles make great programmers.
Näytä tämä ketju -
I originally went to college for the art/design side of game dev. I had always thought that programming was for geniuses—and clearly I wasn’t a genius. Programming is not (just) for geniuses. It’s very practical and grounded in nature. Just like doing chores.
Näytä tämä ketju -
The advice applies to high level programmers who think low level programming is only for the savants. A lot of it is more of the same, with different constraints.
Näytä tämä ketju -
If you’re skittish about programming, don’t be. If you’re a stay at home mom, you’re probably already practicing lots of programming concepts and one day could be one of the greats of our industry.
Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.