Does anyone know if there’s a way to get exhaustiveness checking in pattern matches of this form? http://bit.ly/Y6ud29
-
-
-
Replying to @mergeconflict
@mergeconflict I’m not sure it’s a bug so much as an oversight/limitation in the implementation of the pattern matcher.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak @mergeconflict yeah. There is no "unconditional" unapply. Always has the option of returning None :-/
1:11 PM - 28 Nov 2012
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.