Trump's novel comparison of Kavanaugh to the Saudi state nicely illustrates the difference between direct and circumstantial evidence: there was direct evidence against Kavanaugh but only circumstance evidence against the Saudis. A thread:
-
Show this thread
Replying to @cathyjf1
I DIDNT KNOW THAT THE SOUND COMING OUT OF 1 PERSONS MOUTH COUNTED AS DIRECT EVIDENCE BECAUSE THE ONLY THING MATHEMATICALLY AND DIRECTLY AND OBJECTIVELY MEASURARABLE SYRUP THINGS LIKE FREQUENCY AND AMPLITUDE. WHAT IS A CIRCUMCISION EVIDENCE VS DIRECTION EVIDENCE PLEASE EXPLAAAAIN!
9:43 AM - 25 Oct 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.