Thùy Vy T Nguyễn    

@thuyvytnguyen

Assistant Professor Research solitude 🛋️ , self-determination theory, self-regulation. RT for self-archive & like things that make me happy.

United Kingdom
Vrijeme pridruživanja: srpanj 2017.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @thuyvytnguyen

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @thuyvytnguyen

  1. Prikvačeni tweet

    Haunting question: "Can you feel loss for something you’ve never known?" Forest 404: In 24th Century, the protagonist, tasked w deleting past files discovers old "recordings of rainforests – places which no longer exist"

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. Just a wee reminder about our upcoming special issue in Cortex on "Cognitive & Motor Processes in Visuospatial Attention", submission opens 15th Feb, closes 15th July

    Poništi
  3. prije 4 sata

    It's a beautiful morning & we're ready to go for today's conference, chaired by ! Good luck to all our wonderful speakers 😀

    Poništi
  4. prije 18 sati

    It's gonna be a great day to celebrate the newest conducted by the brilliant PGR students of our department - so proud and happy to be part of this adventure 😁

    Poništi
  5. 3. velj

    Hey Economic Psychologists and JDM Researchers, Come work with us in Tilburg. We have 2 vacancies for Assistant Professors, one tenure track and one 2-years fixed term.

    Poništi
  6. 3. velj

    Academic tweeps, editor asking not to highlight in the abstract that the experiments were preregistered. I would like to keep it, how should I respond?

    Poništi
  7. 2. velj

    It is grad school interview season in North America. Amusing how esteemed social psychologists through all social psychology knowledge out of the window when approaching this topic. Despite interviews having no benefits for estimating students' future performance, many favor them

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 2. velj

    PSPB editors during the replication failure decade (Kitayama, Wegener & Fabrigar, ). - No open science badges. - No major changes in replicabilty - Still evidence of QRPs in 2019. - Lost opportunity to learn from crisis.

    Poništi
  9. 2. velj

    Glad that I did an RR as my first submission. Really good research training in making things clear and transparent, and thank for guidance and an incredible compilation of resources!

    Poništi
  10. Also, stigmas around mental disorders vary in different cultures, affecting likelihood of seeking help; statistically international students are less likely to seek professional help or uni support than natives.

    Poništi
  11. Are you a student? Do you like Open Science? Consider becoming a CREP Assistant -- workload is around 1hr/week/avg and the person in this role gets priority for advanced authorship on their assigned study. DM me for more info.

    Poništi
  12. 1. velj

    My wife is looking for choral singers in the UK to give their views on what the role of a conductor should be as part of her PhD research - please take part or share! Link here:

    Poništi
  13. 1. velj

    "You just have to Google smartphone addiction and you’d be convinced that it is a thing, even though it is not a psychiatrically recognised disorder. To talk about smartphones affecting the brain is a really slippery slope"

    Poništi
  14. Actually, thanks to recent changes in the field, if you think it's a failure to replicate, try for a Registered Replication Report

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 1. velj

    I'm currently writing up the results of a repeated measures design, in which participants responded to the same scale within different conditions. When conducting a cronbach's alpha, should I report a separate one for each condition, or one across conditions?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. (2) evaluate your effect sizes across studies to see consistency. There might be other ways. I am still learning to identify when it's a fluke and when I'm on to sth. P.S. Looking back, it helped that my advisors also stood behind my finding. *** THE END aka dinner time! ***

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. BUT, it's worthwhile to question previous literature, b/c there is also a small chance you've found sth new. I am not sure how often this happens but it does. If you suspect you're on to sth new: (1) keep running studies to make sure you replicate. 6/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. So, fellow ECRs, maybe you run a study and find sth inconsistent w prev research that leads you to doubt urself: "I must've done sth wrong". Maybe. OR, very likely ur study might be 1 of many "file drawer" studies of the lit. You might be stronger but I'd cry and do sth else 5/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. At time of R&R, I already ran more studies: same effect kept showing up. In my revision, I explained my process, how I found inconsistent result, questioned prev literature, followed up w new measures, and here is my 2 new studies. Paper got published w 2 more studies added 4/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. I submitted paper with 2 studies and got desk rejected multiple times. Then at 1 journal, it got an R&R. One reviewer questioned that decision of new measures seem post-hoc b/c why would I differentiate affects differently from larger literature. 3/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. I checked: yes I coded them correctly. My finding wasn't consistent w past research: NA should be higher. I reviewed previous study, suspected it was a measure issue so I ran more studies w revised measure: same thing emerged. I think I might've found something interesting. 2/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·