Literally decades of research show us some things very, very clearly, among the most salient for national origins that we can only understand the United States that was founded in the Revolution and then the Federal Constitution when we understand the essential histories 7/
-
Show this thread
-
of Native Americans, settler colonialism, and dispossession, the magnitude of Atlantic slavery and the enslaved, and the ways these phenomena and peoples were fundamentally entwined with the Br Am/ colonial focus of much of the traditional narrative. 8/
1 reply 6 retweets 62 likesShow this thread -
As shorthand, it matters that x% of signers of the DOI or the Fed Constitution were personally invested in slavery, but it profoundly matters that 100% of them were enmeshed in a political economy of slavery. 9/
1 reply 11 retweets 76 likesShow this thread -
I note decades of research because that is measured in traditional professional journals and venues. Really its centuries of knowledge and publication by Native and Black writers. It's been the work of many, many scholars, writers, more to make this as plain as it now is. 10/
1 reply 3 retweets 47 likesShow this thread -
What we do with this is the question that has been made more obvious by the
#1619Project among others. The stakes could not be higher. 11/1 reply 3 retweets 40 likesShow this thread -
The second issue is how early America/nists deal with those stakes, and how our professional practices have been embedded in the same dynamics that have made those histories at stake harder to know, harder to surface. 12/
1 reply 3 retweets 39 likesShow this thread -
We have largely relied on the scholars doing this research & writing to push it to the surface-- unethical & unsustainable. Our professional orgs must support the scholars whose research & interpretive work we need & have all benefitted fr --this is as urgent as the history. 13/
1 reply 8 retweets 56 likesShow this thread -
This is Twitter (obv). I have generalized and flattened very complex issues (obv). These two features have much deeper histories (obv). And I am not writing about
#SHEAR2020 but about the field – my field in toto (likely also obv). 14/1 reply 3 retweets 43 likesShow this thread -
We must be historians of our professional practice, the histories we read, the histories we are crafting & teaching, & the organizations we build & invest in. Attn to the histories of our histories sounds meta because it is- it may be the most important thing we do. finis//
2 replies 9 retweets 113 likesShow this thread -
Namaste, here is your unroll: @kawulf: Two challenges are at the center of professional practice for me as an early Americanist. First, this is a… https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1284908039728922630.html … Have a good day. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
