Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @thomas_jesson
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @thomas_jesson
-
Prikvačeni tweet
Gonna listen back to this now and tweet out some links and pictures to go with ithttps://twitter.com/TPMPodcast/status/1157922023051603968 …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Congrats to all those stumbling over the finishing line in the
#ReadAPaperADayChallenge . I er... consciously uncoupled mid month...@PalingClaire@kfjnordin I have a few of your videos saved to review!Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Tom Jesson proslijedio/la je Tweet
A number of your so called 'occult' radicular presentations in clinc this month
. @thomas_jesson Nothing like subverting your clincal reasong

pic.twitter.com/oHvzDz5BWpHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
This guy has a foot drop from spinal surgery and is wearing an AFO!
https://twitter.com/Ballislife/status/1217642109404172288 …
0:26Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Tom Jesson proslijedio/la je Tweet
@thomas_jesson I love how you have merged English literature into physiotherapy!communication is what separates humans from all animal species, complex, collaborative and skilled#thethirdspacehttps://podcasts.apple.com/nz/podcast/the-physio-matters-podcast/id785762010?i=1000455104797 …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Thread of cool postures over the decades
https://twitter.com/visakanv/status/1218220512460951552 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Tom Jesson proslijedio/la je Tweet
Generally, I think shifting the focus away from "effect" and "no effect" would help. Effects vary in magnitude, consistency, etc. Few are 0, many are relatively small, others are larger, and they'll vary from person-to-person.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Tom Jesson proslijedio/la je Tweet
Can’t say enough good things about this episode with
@thomas_jesson and @JohnLauner. Thank you both for a novel (for me) and inspiring episode. Book purchased & I can’t wait to dig in!https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-physio-matters-podcast/id785762010?i=1000455104797 …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Tom Jesson proslijedio/la je Tweet
Since we don't know whether the null hypothesis is true, we cannot say that differences "occurred due to chance." One could say the observed effect is likely not meaningful, but it need not be 0. Statistics is about quantifying uncertainty; not transmuting it into certainty.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Tom Jesson proslijedio/la je Tweet
Yes, to conclude no effect because p > 0.05 or because the observed effect is not "practically meaningful" is plain wrong. There can be practical equivalence, but "no effect" implies the effect is *exactly* zero. IMO, it's exceedingly rare that this language is appropriate.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
I am a conservative and tend to think such difference likely not clinically significant for most and maybe exaggerated by trial bias, but to write "no effect" is just wrong, no?
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
I was just reading a trial today that found 1.1 diff in VAS btwn groups but because the CI overlapped 0 (by 0.1) they concluded "no effect", even wrote it in the title of the paper...https://twitter.com/BMJ_EBM/status/1217542347770167298 …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
I am a conservative and tend to think such a difference not clinically relevant for most, and likely some of it is bias too - but to say "no effect" is just wrong, no?
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
I was just reading a trial today that found 1 point mean difference in VAS btwn two groups but because CI overlapped 0 (by 0.1) authors concluded "no effect" of rx, even put it in the title.https://twitter.com/BMJ_EBM/status/1217542347770167298 …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
An overwhelming NO. I feel sorry for LinkedIn now
https://twitter.com/thomas_jesson/status/1217506930291302403 …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.