This, unironically. 40% of the population is creative to some degree. Intellectual property law exists to monopolise the intellectual capital that creative types produce. The constant expansion of IP law has the goal of monetising the exercise of a fundamental necessary impulse.https://twitter.com/BeigeShiba/status/1222842420372488192 …
-
-
These people have accepted the "Copyright law protects creators" lie that these Intellectual-property rent seekers use to justify their intellectual-property-landlording. Adam Smith and Karl Marx would have been apoplectic at the state of modern copyright law. It's parasitic.pic.twitter.com/arFeVBRLSj
Prikaži ovu nit -
There's nothing wrong with that. I'm very concerned with proper attribution myself. However I'm talking about certain types of people here who are obsessed with their work never being reposted, or screech at people who don't tag the creator in an OP.https://twitter.com/Elvenmonk/status/1222873099428696064 …
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
My issue is when people actively remove credit. There's nothing wrong with wanting to be credited for work
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.