This, unironically. 40% of the population is creative to some degree. Intellectual property law exists to monopolise the intellectual capital that creative types produce. The constant expansion of IP law has the goal of monetising the exercise of a fundamental necessary impulse.https://twitter.com/BeigeShiba/status/1222842420372488192 …
-
-
Apologies to everyone I've mentioned, the "replying to" part of the UI is strangely absent from my twitter right now. I can't untag you. (See image).pic.twitter.com/p92w1qP0r7
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Now, something I should have mentioned earlier. The sheer level of brainwashing that goes into maintaining and manufacturing consent for copyright law. Think of all the artists who hate, their work being reposted. Or fans that screech when you don't give credit.
Prikaži ovu nit -
These people have accepted the "Copyright law protects creators" lie that these Intellectual-property rent seekers use to justify their intellectual-property-landlording. Adam Smith and Karl Marx would have been apoplectic at the state of modern copyright law. It's parasitic.pic.twitter.com/arFeVBRLSj
Prikaži ovu nit - Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.