This, unironically. 40% of the population is creative to some degree. Intellectual property law exists to monopolise the intellectual capital that creative types produce. The constant expansion of IP law has the goal of monetising the exercise of a fundamental necessary impulse.https://twitter.com/BeigeShiba/status/1222842420372488192 …
-
-
I speculate that another reason is the sheer level of mutually assured destruction that would ensue, due of the level of 'narrative and conceptual sampling' that goes on when making narrative works. Great artists steal, and all that. But that might not stop them in the end.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Apologies to everyone I've mentioned, the "replying to" part of the UI is strangely absent from my twitter right now. I can't untag you. (See image).pic.twitter.com/p92w1qP0r7
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.