This, unironically. 40% of the population is creative to some degree. Intellectual property law exists to monopolise the intellectual capital that creative types produce. The constant expansion of IP law has the goal of monetising the exercise of a fundamental necessary impulse.https://twitter.com/BeigeShiba/status/1222842420372488192 …
-
-
Remember, Disney got big by adapting classic fairy tales to the big screen. They were working off existing IP, adapting it to a new format. That's illegal now, as Don Mappin, the creator of the Fate Core Mass Effect RPG found out. (Quote image from): https://mailanka.blogspot.com/2016/01/psi-wars-dont-convert-create.html …pic.twitter.com/2R9G8H4zsK
Prikaži ovu nit -
Back to the music industry for a moment. Here,
@adamneelybass explains the sheer insanity of a relatively recent copyright case that further proves that "sounding remotely similar is now illegal." This is what they want to do for every single type of mediahttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ytoUuO-qvg …Prikaži ovu nit -
A reason that corporate control of other regions of IP hasn't advanced as far as the music industry is because music is mathematical and thus similarities can be detected algorithmically. Fully automated corporate rentseeking isn't (yet) possible for narrative works.
Prikaži ovu nit -
I speculate that another reason is the sheer level of mutually assured destruction that would ensue, due of the level of 'narrative and conceptual sampling' that goes on when making narrative works. Great artists steal, and all that. But that might not stop them in the end.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Apologies to everyone I've mentioned, the "replying to" part of the UI is strangely absent from my twitter right now. I can't untag you. (See image).pic.twitter.com/p92w1qP0r7
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.