this half-assed attempt at satire falls completely flat because the NYT's attempt to give a soft-focus profile to every Nazi in America and op-ed space to every Trump voter means that an article calling for banning Jewish people feels perfectly plausible as something they'd print
-
Show this thread
-
and Bret Stephens wrote a piece called "When
#MeToo
Goes Too Far" just a fucking month ago and it was 100% sincere, so expecting people to get on first glance that he's doing a bit when he says to ban Jewish immigrants is arrogant as fuck1 reply 13 retweets 60 likesShow this thread -
both his personal reputation and the reputation of his newspaper mean that people would have completely legitimate reason to think he actually wants to ban Jewish immigrants
2 replies 8 retweets 42 likesShow this thread -
basic structure for pieces in newspapers puts most of the information in the first paragraph and more detail as it goes on, so people who just want the basics can just read the beginning and still be informed
1 reply 3 retweets 26 likesShow this thread -
he started out with basic red-baiting and pointing out that most of the spies who gave nuclear secrets to the USSR were Jewish and gave very little reason why anyone wouldn't think "well I guess the NYT is going full Breitbart" and read something that's actually good instead
1 reply 5 retweets 33 likesShow this thread -
i run a thinkpiece-mocking satirical twitter bot and even i know better than to program it to say things like "Ban Jews" because Jewish people have enough fucking problems without having that pop up looking like a real headline
2 replies 25 retweets 97 likesShow this thread -
the meme shirt is, as always, right, and this fails the meme shirt test (also if anyone knows who made the meme shirt and they are OK with being associated with it, please let me know, this thing is foundational for me)pic.twitter.com/kIqzvKww11
2 replies 40 retweets 142 likesShow this thread -
but also if you're known to be kind of a bigot and are publishing in a newspaper known for plastering fascist apology all over its op-ed section several times a week, you can't expect people to just assume you're being ~ironic~ when you write an article titled "Ban Jews"
1 reply 9 retweets 48 likesShow this thread -
and i'm constantly floored by the fact that the fucking ~newspaper of record~ manages to fail the ethical standards that i hold my joke-generating twitter robot to
2 replies 11 retweets 63 likesShow this thread -
that's not me being a braggart about how i am better than the new york times or anything, that's me saying that this shit is not that fucking hard and they still manage to fuck it up constantly
1 reply 1 retweet 39 likesShow this thread
next time you're thinking about writing something that you only expect people to read based on shock value, ask yourself: is this the same kind of thing a 4chan nazi would write while pretending that their bigotry is ~just ironic~?
-
-
if the answer "yes", do some actual fucking self-reflection for once in your shitty, pretentious life, you fucking asshole.
1 reply 3 retweets 42 likesShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.