What do you think about this?https://goo.gl/fojSff
-
-
Antwort an @GunOwners
Then a 17 year old can sue. Or a 12 year old even. However, no one is entitled to someone’s labor. Much like with the wedding cake situation. You shouldn’t be able to force someone to provide a product or service.
1 Antwort 1 Retweet 0 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @think_liberty @GunOwners
The legal age to buy a rifle is 18, they changed their company policy to exclude an age range from doing a legal act but not others. Its discrimination plain and simple.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @RFoxxe @GunOwners
With that logic, if the law was 21, like it is in some states now, it’d be fine. All Americans have a right to bear arms and protect themselves don’t they? Even those 18 and under.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @think_liberty @GunOwners
This country has decided that 18 is the age of adulthood. I think thats ok where it is. Yes if the age for all in the state to buy a rifle was 21 then it would be fine. Because the law is applied equally. Dicks excluding people for no other reason than age. Thats discrimintory
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mir
You can’t force a company to provide a service to you regardless. But the law for minimum age to purchase is unconstitutional. However, a store is free to set its own policies for sales.
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.