What sort mental contortions must you jump through to read "Nothing good comes from our involvement in #Syria" as anti-withdrawal? The fact that Turkey will now attack the Kurds is an indictment of both the alliance w/ Turkey and the futility of intervening in the first place.
-
-
Antwort an @AndrewRCraig @LPNational
It’s because this is an Amash tweet isn’t it?
1 Antwort 1 Retweet 1 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @think_liberty @LPNational
Amash is great. Your attempt to bash the LP's tweet is nonsense. They're both clearly against U.S. intervention in Syria. That we end up "allied" with opposing sides in a conflict is a perfectly common and standard argument against interventions and entangling alliances.
1 Antwort 1 Retweet 1 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @AndrewRCraig @LPNational
The LP tweet gave off the implication that without the USAs presence, Syria was screwed. This isn’t gymnastics. Plenty of people thought the same thing.
1 Antwort 1 Retweet 0 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @think_liberty @LPNational
It implied no such thing and that's an interpretation so absurd it's bordering on illiterate. You don't imply support for a policy by saying "nothing good comes of" it or that its results are "tragic and predictable." It's because it's an LP tweet, isn't it?
2 Antworten 1 Retweet 1 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @AndrewRCraig @LPNational
Bordering on illiterate? Ahh so I’m just not smart enough to understand the tweet. Well then...
1 Antwort 1 Retweet 0 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @think_liberty @LPNational
When you're claiming it somehow implies the exact opposite of what it plainly says... I've seen L.P. statements I thought off-base before. But this complaint is nonsense. It's not even an uncharitable reading of it. It's a just plain false reading of it.
1 Antwort 1 Retweet 1 Gefällt mir -
"The ironies of our foreign policy are endless. We have troops in over 120 countries of the world and support, financially and militarily, both sides of most of the current military conflicts." - Ron Paul making the same point. By your logic he's implying we should back one side!
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @AndrewRCraig @LPNational
No because that’s a clear statement.
1 Antwort 1 Retweet 0 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @think_liberty @LPNational
There was nothing unclear about the LP's tweet. You're just contriving a malicious interpretation of it because you don't like the LP. Take the exact same statement from a source you don't dislike and the point is obvious. Nobody implies support by "nothing good" or "tragic."
2 Antworten 1 Retweet 0 Gefällt mir
“You're just contriving a malicious interpretation of it because you don't like the LP.”pic.twitter.com/ybXPZJZ69Z
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.