People and companies in your place will see the personal benefits of self-driving cars once a neighboring city, state, or country allows for it. That creates competitive pressure to update regulation. Governments are slow, but this will move faster than you think.
-
-
That would be a mistake to replace rail with AVs, rail is a more passively safe transit form while AVs are complex active systems with infinitely more complex ways of failing. This will always be true. We want efficient and as simple of transit systems as possible.
-
My expectation is that we will be able to bring down the self-driving car safety incident rate down far enough that people consider it worth it. The current rate is rather dismal and plenty of us are ok with that. All these personal decisions are risk/reward balances.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The forms that fall in this category today: walking and biking
-
Yep. I see (technological/infrastructural) innovations in the biking industry that could lead to different usage. However, I'm not sure what that would look like for walking. Any thoughts?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
at
retweets