Amsterdam: $87b Booking $65b Adyen $16b Takeawayhttps://twitter.com/bgurley/status/1350869336978690049 …
-
Show this thread
-
To be honest though: I assume one of the spin-off effects Gurley expects from 3 decacorns is early employees using their stock option returns to reinvest in the ecosystem. Which doesn’t happen in Amsterdam, because Dutch companies are stingy.
8 replies 5 retweets 70 likesShow this thread -
Proposals for what the Netherlands could do to increase the number of (tech) startups often boil down to “more subsidies.” Instead, we should consider 3 systemic changes: ⁃ Incentivize stock compensation ⁃ Simplify corporate bankruptcy ⁃ Ban non-compete clauses
4 replies 5 retweets 79 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @thijsniks
Banning non-compete has two sides though: if you own important IP you want that protection wherever you settle. In any case, you should check out the (options) Market Maket business,where A'dam completely dominates and similar issues are at play.good legal and tax infra seems key
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vdmandele
Non-compete clauses increase the market power of large companies at the expense of new companies and employees. It’s one way for them to pay less salary. And tech, aerospace, and entertainment does very well without this kind of protectionism in California.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @thijsniks
all true, though in Tech it's much more difficult to hide IP than in trading I guess, so maybe you get sufficient protection from IP-laws already? Unsure really
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I have no idea what trading IP is actually, but find it hard to imagine more competition would be a problem :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
at
retweets