The mere concept of “partisan judges” is properly insane.
-
-
I mean, textualists vs interpretive is a judicial debate that goes back thousands of years, and hasn’t mapped historically to US parties. Maybe very recently? Bush 41 nominated Souter, for example.

-
Souter nomination has always thrown me for a curve ball. Country must’ve been a different place then.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
at
retweets