-
-
Replying to @kluivers
I’m surprised the Netherlands still has a minimum capitalization requirement. Seems like an impediment to forming a startup.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @optshiftk
That requirement for the BV legal form was dropped in 2012 iirc.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kluivers
But BVs seem to have other restrictions compared to an NV, like having to go to a notary to transfer shares. There’s no capital requirement for any form of incorporation in the US.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @optshiftk @kluivers
A BV is fine though. You really shouldn’t incorporate as a NV till you’re successful
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thijsniks @kluivers
So, California is a little weird in that its tax structure discourages our equivalent of BVs (LLCs) in favor of standard incorporation. But the general philosophy here is that everyone’s entitled to limited liability as long as they pay the filing fee.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
LLCs have limits, and standard corporations impose many more investor-friendly requirements, so LLCs will probably eventually re-file. But why throw obstacles in the way of starting out as a full blown corporation in the first place? Whom does that serve?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
There really aren't that many obstacles to incorporating a limited company (BV) in the Netherlands, except for the notary having to sign off on the articles of incorporation. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing if you believe non-experts are prone to mess it up.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
at
retweets