It’s still tricky though. Free public transit systems tend to have high rates of vandalism and crime, making them less attractive to passengers. And often cannibalize more walking and biking than cars.
It can work, but just often isn't the best way to achieve high ridership. Most transit riders prefer a fast, frequent, and reliable service over lower cost. Parking and congestion charges are also more effective at reducing car usage. https://transitcenter.org/transit-be-free/ …
-
-
I'm also gonna guess that vandalism and crime are lower in Melbourne than in most North American cities (though someone should look up the numbers)
-
A big reason for introducing the OV-chipkaart in the Netherland, for example, was that it would allow for fare gates at metro and train stations in order to reduce crime
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
at
retweets