It is frankly horrifying to me that some in the election systems industry continue to cling to the delusional claim that paperless voting systems aren’t vulnerable to practical attacks and software failures. Experts are unanimous that these systems are dangerous and obsolete.
Is the reason for computer counting instead of human counting to reduce cost?
-
-
US elections are hugely complex, both in terms of number of ballot questions and number of different ballot types. Full hand counting is impractical (and likely too inaccurate in close races) at scale for most jurisdictions here. It works in some localities, but not most.
-
That makes sense. Thank you!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
at
retweets