Points off for grammatical error
-
-
-
Damn, where is it?
-
“for you yourself will *be*...”
-
Ah, I meant "will" in the sense of willing something, as in: the accelerationist wills their own dissolution. But I can see it is unclear.
-
Maybe it should be “you will will”, because everyone likes repetition
-
Nono, it's correct how it is, just archaic in all the right ways.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think this grasps the defect in self-professed accelerationism, namely a hypostasization of structure that seems to regard the possibility of agency as wholly precluded and substituted by institutional activity (the kind of mistake we also find in decent theorists like Luhmann)
-
But structure can't acquire this sort of autonomy. Agency is ineliminable *because* of the role it plays in the structuration of institutions. To think agency could be swallowed in this way by structure is a fetishistic fantasy of perfect integration through perfect alienation.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
By the way, where is Goofy?
-
Perhaps he'll show up and present the Synthesis.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
stealing memes but adding your own pseudo-intellectual babble into it is pretty cringe dude
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
not in the Landian acc as I understand it, as the transformative process is anti-human in nature
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well done
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


