Hot take: Social media is the means by which all relationships become parasocial. Even if you know a personal IRL, your interaction with them online is asymmetrical, because you only ever interact with a curated version of them: affection directed toward a shadow.
-
-
Replying to @thewastedworld
Agree but I think its also possible to see it as an abstracted intensification of asymmetries in expectations of decorum, manner, position, etc. If meatspace has its own linguistic/behavioral mediations, maybe social media is both para and meta-social in its emulation of them
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mumpsump @thewastedworld
Para/meta-social relations offline: priest-parishaner, analyst-analysand, business-customer, teacher student, parent-child come to mind, really anything but "true friendship" is asymmetrical, and even then symmetry and authenticity aren't nessissarly best measures of a friendship
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Online or offline there are always problems of transference, social media is a bit of a transference machine accelerator, heating it up, cooling it off, blowing it up, breaking it off.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @izricklyn @mumpsump
The parasocial isn't just asymmetrical, it is mediated and mass produced. The priest, analyst, etc. is still someone in the same space as you, who talks back to you alone. The parasocial is addressed to a mass, and each in this audience imagines a personal address to themselves.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Perhaps a better offline example would be the performer or the politician, who addresses a crowd. I'm thinking of how Klaus Theweleit discusses the fascist speech-makers whose rants would be read as a personal address and vindication: "The labor is his, the intoxication theirs."
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


