Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
NASA officials say SpaceX will complete construction of the Crew Dragon capsule for its first operational mission "3 months earlier than originally planned," according to the GAO, citing manufacturing efficiencies and SpaceX modifying facilities and bringing in more resources.pic.twitter.com/aXHtsng9aR
Boeing officials told the GAO that refurbishing the Starliner capsule from December's uncrewed flight test will take 4 months.pic.twitter.com/0oKj3Av59z
But NASA officials say "a number of problems were found in recent" testing of Starliner's initiators – while Boeing's design was an accepted risk for the uncrewed test, NASA will require additional testing before a crewed flight.pic.twitter.com/DjlInpJxsW
"Uncertainty remains about when operational missions can begin ... it also remains to be seen whether either contractor can finish manufacturing the hardware and training the astronauts in order to support NASA’s planned time frames" Full GAO report: https://www.gao.gov/assets/710/704121.pdf …
Wrong. GAO reports says: “The launch vehicle engine risk remains open because SpaceX needed to complete the required follow-on test campaign of its engines as of November 2019.” Roy doesn’t mention the parachutes. Wonder if the GAO bean counters mixed engines up w/ parachutes.
Crewed won’t be refurbished, right.
I assume there is a computer munching away on the data somewhere, but any feeling for when flight proven is actually more reliable than new construction? What are the assumed risks of preflown? (After first group of test and operational flights obviously)
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
