Phil "Esquire" StewartVerified account

any chance that we should look into the whole 0 land ratio on circles other than 4 and 8? Gets kinda watery these days

As far as i know it is still what is recommended from PUBG's side due to a coding / algorithm concern. This was the settings that was used for PGI for a reason We want circles to be less predictable. Not more

Was just wondering, whats better: - Have 3 circles be unprediactable and a (some times) 100% knowledge of where circle 4 will go. - Have circle 3 be "a bit more" predictable (not going to be 50% water or more) to minimize chance of having circle 4 guaranteed in a certain place.

you dont want predictability imo, that ruins the whole concept of good rotations and making good choices based on your current situation, predictability = pubg v1.0 lets all run to the centre haHAA

Well, with the current settings circle 4 and 8 are more predictable than ever if there's water around. So I'm just trying to figure a way around that. Maybe not have it shift as far away from water as possible (1.0), but maybe with "less water included" at 0.6-0.8 or something?

Let the circles be free! (im all for less water btw but we shouldn’t be messing too much with predictability chances as that impacts the competition, just my opinion)

Hm... my fear of having 80% water circles in the end-game leaves me too scared to have it completely random. Everything considered, there is quite a bit of water around Erangel. On Miramar it might be more of an option

why would you use two settings tho for different maps? one for all and keep it simple :)