As a literary form, in its own way, Logic of Sense thematically takes on the flattening movement of Through the Looking Glass, when Deleuze transitions from a Carroll-centric discussion to emphasizing Artaud’s speculations and investigations
I agree, the distinctions between these two temporal frameworks are definitely essential: perhaps he meant them for the rereading. I wonder how a guide would look for those preparing to reread? What would be accentuated, in the second sifting?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.