140/ The history of humanity is at the same time, in the same gesture, a single and split history, duplicitous rather than dualistic: history(ies) of the oppressed and/or the oppressors.
-
Show this thread
-
141/ Dualism is always a reaction, a passive flight facing the Master, the philosophy of those who have not been able or succeeded in becoming Masters, the politics of those who recognize themselves as defeated.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
142/ Duplicity is the thought of the active defeated, of the *active Rebel* who thinks the history of humanity as chiasmus and his *own* history as the impossible quadrature in which the circular history of mastery is inscribed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
143/ Duplicity then designates a type of universal relation formulable as *inclusive disjunction* (contradiction without mediation):
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
144/ the Master assimilates the Rebel, appropriates or includes him by law and grace united, but the active Rebel distinguishes himself from the Master, refuses to be recognized as defeated or posits an image of himself,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
145/ because he does not recognize himself—this is his activity—and because his only representation of himself would suffice to make him reenter under the law and make him become...dualistic.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
146/ he politics of the Rebel as resistant excludes the overly massive disjunctions of dualism, i.e. that which remains synthesis through which mastery includes the adversary.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
147/ Having supposed, through paralogism, that *desire* is confused with the given sex, Revolution with sexual rebellion, identities which found the eternity of mastery, dualism must then massively cut, abstractly and transcendently separate sex and desire
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
148/ (there will be a specific desire of the Rebel that will not be sexual), sex and rebellion (rebellion without relation to sexuality, contrary to “discourses of liberation”).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
149/ Sometimes the whole of desire will be the Master, sometimes there will be a desire that will escape from the Master. Sometimes every discourse will be the master's, sometimes there will be an autonomous discourse of the Rebel.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread
Should read: sometimes the whole of desire will be the Master’s.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.