Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
theory_talk's profile
theory_talk
theory_talk
theory_talk
@theory_talk

Tweets

theory_talk

@theory_talk

An episodic philosophy podcast/critical thinking jam session | @fractalontology + @tadkins613: subscribe to http://patreon.com/theorytalk  for exclusive content

soundcloud.com/theory-talk
Joined January 2017

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

      83/ In this quadrature, what is it that resists in this way and, through its resistance, makes text and thought move in a circle of Eternal return? This is the subversive pole of Nietzsche-thought:

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Show this thread
    2. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

      84/ never given in the surface of the text, no longer localizable by a labor of the signifier, never decipherable by the Marxist political grid, never interpretable as historical meaning. It will however no longer be said, in the manner of modern structuralists,

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Show this thread
    3. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

      85/ that this revolutionary pole, both the part and “whole” of the ERS/WP, is absent or excluded, that it is effective due to its absence, its repression, its invisibility.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Show this thread
    4. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

      86/ This pole actively resists (i.e. without representing the adversary in an image or a law), this pole forces all the rest of the Nietzschean assemblage [dispositif] to move precisely because it resists the latter.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Show this thread
    5. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

      87/ It is starting from this resistance that its active absence must be rethought and rewritten as *absance* (why not?), as in?visibility, etc. [fn. 2]

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Show this thread
    6. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

      88/ [Translator's note: this is a neologism modeled after Derrida's différance, capturing the silent difference of the a/e in French in the simple graphic shift of e-->a. The coinage of “in?visibility” may be modeled after Deleuze's ?-being in *Difference and Repetition*.]

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Show this thread
    7. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

      89/ Nietzsche invents a new concept of revolution as active resistance to the powers that be, the politics, if it can be called this, of the *resistant quarter* rather than that of the excluded quarter.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Show this thread
    8. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

      90/ The consequence of this is that the whole remainder of Nietzsche-thought, all of it that becomes visible according to traditional criteria—i.e. nearly “all” of the “doctrine”—is elevated to the state of ideological, relatively (for the revolutionary pole)

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Show this thread
    9. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

      91/ necessary and objective appearance (thus from the point of view of the Quadripartition and its criteria, not from that of the traditional interpreters).

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Show this thread
    10. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

      92/ The other consequence is that this political objective appearance can only be that of Mastery, namely that of its extreme historical form, Fascism.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Show this thread
      theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

      93/ We never stop saying with and more so *against* those who more or less overtly consider that Nietzsche is compromised *with* fascism and not just compromised *by* it,

      11:30 AM - 5 May 2018
      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          94/ that his revolutionary power is to have succeeded in elevating fascism to the state of transcendental objective appearance,

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        3. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          95/ to have been able to turn Mastery into an ideological and ultimately positive appearance, and to turn the ideological appearance into a radically materialist usage.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        4. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          96/ The possibility of this understanding must be grasped in the functioning of Nietzsche-thought in general and via the case of Heidegger's interpretation,

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        5. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          97/ which conjugates the greatest proximity to the truth of Nietzsche and necessarily its greatest, most ingenious falsification. [fn 3]

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        6. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          98/ [Footnote #2: We haven't finished exploring anti-Niezschean farce. It arises from a shred of courage enriched by Lacanian teaching: *L'Ange* (Lardreau and Jambet).

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        7. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          99/ Anti-Nietzscheanism inspires fairly dissimilar literatures (albeit not without communication, if we consider the role played by Heidegger in Lacanism): on the one hand, systematic, grandiose misinterpretations, along with Heidegger's memorial faithfulness;

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        8. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          100/ on the other hand, aggressive stupidity, the bowels abounding in insults, which make *L'Ange* into an anthology of traditional misinterpretations (which are sublated, merely *sublated* or idealized misinterpretations of Lacanism)

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        9. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          101/ perpetrated on Nietzsche and which prove—big surprise, this is furthermore what Nietzsche wanted, among others, to prove—that the angel thinks basely.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        10. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          102/ The theses stated here *for* Nietzschean politics are partly destined to reestablish its truth, i.e. to unmask, up to and including Heidegger, the empirical forms of the most dangerous misunderstanding.]

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        11. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          103/ No psychological, historicist, ethical, or political critique (in the banal sense) of the interpretation and thought of Heidegger. The Heidegger case is valid due to the geniality in the political exploitation of Nietzschean understanding,

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        12. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          104/ it marks *the gathering together of the essence of this misunderstanding* and consequently the point of possible transmutation of the relation of falsification to Nietzsche into a relation of authentification,

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        13. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          105/ starting from which a turn-about (Gegen-Kehre) of Heidegger can begin toward Nietzsche.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        14. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          106/ The turn-about then designates a complex operation that consists on the one hand in *reversing* (Um-kehre) the Heideggerian interpretation, in subordinating ontologico-existential thought to the Nietzschean Break

          1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
          Show this thread
        15. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          107/ (which is formulated later on as “politico-libidinal”), and, on the other hand but simultaneously, to *re-inscribe* (Uber-kehre) this Nietzsche-thought in its veritable space, which is that of a politics of Rebellion or of Resistance.

          2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
          Show this thread
        16. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          108/ Why is our complex political conjuncture, which is criss-crossed by a continuous line of fascisization and a differently continuous line of subversion, *interested* in Nietzsche-thought?

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        17. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          109/ Because Nietzsche's specificity is to *bind*, more intimately, more irremediably than Marx knew how for reasons pertaining to the insufficient historical development of capitalism, this process of fascisization,

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        18. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          110/ which is henceforth manifest as our horizon, and the political and material conditions of its subversion.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        19. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          111/ A little nearer to fascism, a little further away from fascism, in a relation of dangerous but authentic co-belonging, Nietzsche had to incur the risk of having to embrace the adversary in order to smother him.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        20. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          112/ Nietzsche's interpreters are the blind victims of this risk, more so than he himself, since he is its consenting victim.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        21. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          113/ Few have understood the meaning of the greatest misunderstandings, namely that Nietzsche prefers to flow with the adversary, provided that the adversary drowns: the messenger dies in his message, this is the message of Zarathustra.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        22. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          114/ All these historians, these Marxist or Christian critics who accept the shameful task of making him die again, don't they merely account for the fact that they are cruelly trapped by their victim?

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        23. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          115/ This is what is cheerful in the sleepwalking of Christians and Marxists, the enormous psychodrama that they play out before us by believing to put Nietzsche on trial, and where they only expose how little yet they have overcome the fascism in themselves. [end subsection 5]

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
          Show this thread
        24. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          116/ 6. Thus, to think the possibility of subversion, not of mastery in general, but of mastery specified as fascism, the possibility of Revolution, it takes no less than four terms organized into two worlds—or rather, into two poles or two tendencies.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        25. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          117/ The whole problem is not to think with bricks: this is to posit Mastery and Rebellion as two worlds transcendent to one another in the gnostic and Manichean manner [Footnote #3: Cf. *L'Ange*].

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        26. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          118/ Mastery and Rebellion, Fascism and Resistance form the figure of a chiasmus and only involve relations-of-relation. This is why they have to become worlds, there is a becoming-world of fascism, which is produced, never given, or which forms a process.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        27. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          119/ For example, the affinity between the signifier and Mastery does not become a “world”, that of Mastery, except when the signifier is taken in hand, as is the case in psychoanalysis,

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        28. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          120/ by the nihilistic power that leads signifying mastery to the end of what it can do and makes it enter into a process of fascisization.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        29. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          121/ In the same way, there is merely an affinity, not identity, between what Nietzsche calls “forces” *as such*, which are non-signifying elements, indeed anti-signifying agents, and the sole affirmative tendency capable of making them go to the end of what they can do:

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        30. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          122/ to constitute a revolutionary “world”, to become an “autonomous” process of rebellion.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        31. theory_talk‏ @theory_talk May 5

          123/ Perhaps it will be necessary to avoid speaking of “world” to designate the two poles, processes, or tendaecies that co-belong within the Quadripartition, and to find another word to designate the universal moment that they fully contain [Footnote #4].

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        32. 30 more replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info