1/ Original Translation Thread: The opening pages of F. Laruelle's *Nietzsche contre Heidegger* (1977) p. 9-11: 1. Thesis 1: Nietzsche is the revolutionary thinker who corresponds to the era of Imperialism in Capitalism, and more specifically to the era of Fascism in Imperialism.
-
Show this thread
-
2/ Thesis 2: Nietzsche is, in a double sense, the thinker of fascism; he is, *in a certain way*, a thinker of fascism, but he is, *above all*, the thinker of the subversion of fascism.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
3/ Nietzsche-thought is a complex political process with two *contradictory* poles (but without mediation), the relation of subordination of a secondary fascist pole (Mastery) *to* a principle revolutionary pole.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
4/ Nietzsche *makes himself* fascist the better to overcome fascism. He has taken on the worst forms of Mastery to become its Rebel.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
5/ Thesis 3: We are all fascist readers of Nietzsche, we are all revolutionary readers of Nietzsche. Our unity is a contradictory relation (hierarchy without mediation), just as the unity of Nietzsche is a contradictory and *auto*-critical unity.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
6/ Nietzsche puts the Master and the Rebel in a relation of duplicity rather than duality. He liquidates the opposition of monism (philosophy of the Master *or* of the Rebel) and dualism (mediated contradiction of the Master and the Rebel).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
7/ 2. So, this is hardly about you, since you, alas, are all divided. This is hardly about Nietzsche: the same brown and red thread passes within and without Nietzsche.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likesShow this thread -
8/ This is about you or Nietzsche: as political subject, whom you have to become, split by the cause, Revolution or Fascism. What is a revolutionary in her relation to Revolution when she is affected by it as if by the fracture [coupure] of truth that *breaks her in two*.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
9/ This is about your relation to Nietzsche and about what divides it twice: a first time according to the means and techniques that effectuate it,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
10/ a second time according to the political tendency that it supposes or the fascistic or revolutionary pole whose *primacy* it indicates. Complex relation in four terms, something like a “quadripartition.”
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread
[Translator’s sidenote: this term is in quotation marks because the word in French is “quadriparti”, and the word “parti” is the word used to designate political parties (or to designate a course of action).]
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.