I swear I’m not trying to feign ignorance when I say this: I thought we all knew already that RCP8.5 was a high end, worst-case scenario, yet scientists study it anyway bc it’s important to understand tail risks.
-
-
My critique on people who want to throw away RCP 8.5 is two-fold: one, it provides a way to scale unforeseen drivers/feedback loops in - i.e. how much will this phenomena drive us above the more likely scenarios. 2: Donald Trump is President. Don't plan for a politics of reason.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
But that's the rub, it was being sold as what would happen without aggressive climate policies...even though that's not realistic.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
getting more likely. World governance is totally corporate captured. Off the rails
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Well, not entirely. Using 8.5 is a useful test case if you want to clearly see effects. Not all climate research is focussed entirely on politics; unrealistic scenarios are fine. Just as long as you don't accidentally imply they're reasonable.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.