@allofmilov is absolutely right: "They weren’t relying on multiple people’s work and synthesizing. They were relying entirely on my book.” Her argument is so powerful that there is no one to synthesize it with yet. Her insights so new that they are her own. She must be credited.
-
-
-
This is absolutely the way things work with tenure. Or the ancient tradition of stealing from women and other interlopers.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It’s been a few years since I was a history grad student, but I have a hard time believing these professors would accept this “accepted practice” from their students.pic.twitter.com/bVWXOVvVt2
-
To be fair, Here & Now is just the worst. Of course they goofed like this. But it’s on the historians to answer for their lack of professionalism.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
So correct the error
@NPR by having her on the show!!! Not that hard!! - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They make it sound like the format and medium is some vast barrier. It isnt. It is easy to cite, you say that there is a really good book on the subject, which informed much of the discussion and tell the listeners to go buy or preorder it. Even better: interview the expert.
-
I don't think NPR is allowed to ever tell people to buy things but, that doesn't mean they couldn't tell people about it and when it'll be out.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Even if she was a struggling writer, they thought her work of a high enough quality to use it.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.