"we have no evidence to support this conclusion...Mattis tacitly impugned the interventionists who were responsible for pushing the “Assad is guilty” narrative twice without sufficient supporting evidence..."https://www.newsweek.com/now-mattis-admits-there-was-no-evidence-assad-using-poison-gas-his-people-801542?fbclid=IwAR0jxx2XkjqBTeeL_QVYEacM3VcTKX2sALUVfNOaguAxxMad5FSZd4vtxFM …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Robert Fisk, I'll take his reporting over that Bellingcat guy, any day. https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/syria-chemical-attack-gas-douma-robert-fisk-ghouta-damascus-a8307726.html …
-
You ahould read Fisk’s reporting in context - reporters can only learn so much on guided tours to recently recaptured areas under the control of Russian military police and Assad’s secret police: https://theintercept.com/2019/02/09/douma-chemical-attack-evidence-syria/ …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Very neat -maybe too neat? The author found a way to have a cake and eat it. So,the whole thing that we saw in the West was fabrication,just like many anti-war have been claiming and have been ridiculed in West for doing so,BUT that tampered-with canister somehow still was real
End of conversation
-
-
-
Information Vetting is NOT a new process.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
they looked at the evidence
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.