They didn't realize that paper had metadata...
-
-
-
It is very traditional journalist tradecraft to retype leaked documents. They have competent security ppl to advise them.
-
It used to be done because of watermarking, the suspicion that it could be in formatting or on the paper. This was typewriter days.
-
-
Nice find. Source?
-
"Digital Watermarking and Steganography" Page 5 of ISBN 9780080555805
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I've got dibs on "incompetent nincompoops."
-
Dammit! That was gonna be my guess.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think after
den and manning the world only remembered the forged gwb reserve papers -
That’s possible. But as far as scoops go this wasn’t worth a young woman’s freedom. :-/
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I assumed they used a photo to "prove authenticity" ... Which, I mean, ... worked.
-
Definitely authentic stolen classified data. So, that’s a win.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They have enough personnel that knows the existence of this type of metadata. Must have been the pressure to pursue the scoop.
-
What pressure? This is hardly a time-sensitive leak
-
All valid questions.
-
The pressure to have the scoop. They didn't know what other media received the documents. And any media always wants the scoop.
-
Considering it was printed once (according to the complaint) and hand delivered to this specific news org, I don't see any pressure
-
Hand delivered? Source?
-
Sorry not specifically delivered by hand. But no indication that there was any pressure to release this ASAP
-
Any journalist is always afraid someone else will have the scoop. Don't know the content of the message TI received though.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.