It’s impossible to distinguish the intent behind hostile intel collection. Is it for foreign intelligence, or something more sinister?
Love it. Data collection - impossible to tell whether by malicious intelligence or for malicious advertising. http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/11/16/us/politics/china-phones-software-security.html …pic.twitter.com/dR0PcTNa6m
-
-
-
I block ads because fuck ads, but also because it’s impossible to tell the difference between ad tech and Chinese 3PLA operations.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
grumble grumble "nothing to hide"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
a nice paper on countries' tracking ecosystems: https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00832784
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
depends on whether there’s any oversight or laws constraining their use of the data, then it’s gchq.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
in CM it returns empty data, but are 2 trusting of consistency & conformity 2 spec
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
this is insane.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When advertising techniques look like foreign state espionage, maybe they have gone too far?
-
And vice versa.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@RobertMLee - it's versatile information. Collect for ad revenue, subjects of interest to gov't are utilized + trend monitoring.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.