@thegrugq But Schneier, and now GG, have endorsed the 2nd leaker, theory, which seems to imply the src was not in the snowden docs they saw.
A logical reason for why the XKeyscore “src” isn’t another NSA leaker. https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2014-July/007085.html …
-
-
-
@5150committee that assumes: a) it is legit src, and b) only NSA has access. -
@thegrugq XKS src could come from a 2nd party, sure, but the TAO catalog? -
@5150committee what about the TAO catalog? I thought that was supposed to be Snowden. -
-
-
@5150committee@ioerror a second leaker who had access at the same time? it was, apparently, a unique set of circumstances that allowed Snow
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@thegrugq What's your opinion about those Xkeyscore "source code" lines? technically -
@electrospaces they haven’t been authenticated / verified… so maybe its fake. -
@thegrugq@electrospaces it's too convincing of a fake -- those like Jacob Appelbaum aren't smart enough to fake this -
@ErrataRob@electrospaces it is very convincing, i agree. It is probably legit. :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@thegrugq so you're saying a leaker wouldn't possibly have sent a backdated file due to OPSEC? i know i would have.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@thegrugq How many people have access to all Snowden docs? Do you hear them claiming anything of that sort? -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.