Hmm is it normal for academic papers to be 100% rehashed stuff that other people wrote, zero originality?
-
-
Replying to @thegoldqueen
although there should be some contribution from reviewing things.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @restokin
Ok. This paper appears to be "not many people look at this subject in this way, here's all the stuff that might help" very general literature review. May be some more later
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thegoldqueen
and another example from my previous lab using a different structure for reviewing & hypothesis presentation: http://sites.psu.edu/scherflab/wp-content/uploads/sites/18238/2014/10/the-amygdala.pdf …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @restokin
That is useful information to have, I need to learn different structures of academic works
6:17 PM - 10 Nov 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.