Hmm is it normal for academic papers to be 100% rehashed stuff that other people wrote, zero originality?
Ok. This paper appears to be "not many people look at this subject in this way, here's all the stuff that might help" very general literature review. May be some more later
-
-
here's a review article I wrote that has no data: http://sites.psu.edu/scherflab/wp-content/uploads/sites/18238/2014/12/Gaming-autism-JADD-2014.pdf …
-
Alas, I can't read right now, got to knock out this assignment asap
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
and another example from my previous lab using a different structure for reviewing & hypothesis presentation: http://sites.psu.edu/scherflab/wp-content/uploads/sites/18238/2014/10/the-amygdala.pdf …
-
That is useful information to have, I need to learn different structures of academic works
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.