I was curious how this would play out. Someone uploaded the Watts 1996 performance in March 2015. It was a bit truncated than mine, up this afternoon. At 2 PM, his had 7.8K views; mine, 136. 11 PM: His: 9.2K; mine: 9.8K. Honestly wasn't expecting that.
-
Show this thread
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @CableCoShow
This was fascinating, thanks. There are crucial differences: he’s creating superlative original content and rightly monetizes. So the incentive for attracting a large viewership is high. My content survives on the whims of its owners, and I don’t monetize.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @thedonz5 @CableCoShow
I do pay close attention to my thumbnails, though, selecting images that I think best reflect the content. But because this stuff isn’t mine, and turning it into $$ is nonexistent, my incentives for greater viewership are low.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
True. I rely on the attention I give to the descriptions (that too many viewers ignore). If folks take that added step, the reward is just around the corner. If they don’t, their loss.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.