I was curious how this would play out. Someone uploaded the Watts 1996 performance in March 2015. It was a bit truncated than mine, up this afternoon. At 2 PM, his had 7.8K views; mine, 136. 11 PM: His: 9.2K; mine: 9.8K. Honestly wasn't expecting that.
I do pay close attention to my thumbnails, though, selecting images that I think best reflect the content. But because this stuff isn’t mine, and turning it into $$ is nonexistent, my incentives for greater viewership are low.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
True. I rely on the attention I give to the descriptions (that too many viewers ignore). If folks take that added step, the reward is just around the corner. If they don’t, their loss.
End of conversation
-
-
-
And, yes, beyond all that, not my style. Not keen on the “manipulation” aspect. More keen on if you build it, they will come. Naive, certainly. But there’s a purity and simplicity that I like. Plus one less thing to overthink.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.