[cw: child sexual assault] Heh, well, as long as we’re going for “technically correct”... You’re right. “All” Stallman did was defend Marvin Minsky’s rape of a 16-year-old girl. Said rape was facilitated by Epstein, so in defending it, he indirectly defended Epstein’s actions.https://twitter.com/dexter002400/status/1176136689070137344 …
-
Show this thread
-
Even if you object to drawing the line between defending the rape and defending Epstein, the fact remains that he defended Minsky’s rape of a 16-year-old girl.
1 reply 0 retweets 30 likesShow this thread -
Let’s assume, for a minute, that the rape never happened. It’s STILL morally repugnant to defend the idea of Minsky, an old man, having sex with (i.e., raping) a 16-year-old girl.
3 replies 1 retweet 27 likesShow this thread -
“Sometimes it’s ok for an old man to rape a 16-year-old girl” is not a position that anyone with any power should hold. Full stop. End of story ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
3 replies 9 retweets 82 likesShow this thread -
Dear Stallman defenders, You can try that nitpicking bullshit on me if you like, but know that my “technically correct” will _always_ run circles around yours. Love, Sarah
5 replies 7 retweets 54 likesShow this thread
LoL. Talk about blowing your own trumpet. I guess you need to since no one actually thinks you’re “technically” correct ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.