I've been using this gif a lotpic.twitter.com/lwukLppSKT
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It may not be a conspiracy theory but it’s definitely conspiracist thinking—framing it as the default, and continually pushing it as if there is new corroborating evidence of it.
-
This part is what gets mehttps://twitter.com/nathanoseroff/status/1400028180300419074 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
people who are drawn to crazed conspiracism are drawn to the lab leak hypothesis, sure, but it's still completely believable that there was an effort to play down the plausibility of the hypothesis by some scientists. The conflicts of interest are pretty obvious for some.
-
Sure, but that’s pretty speculative without any new bombshell evidence. At best we can say it’s plausible and evidence may come to light but much more than that gets dicey imo
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If someone is mentioning "lab leak" in the context of international safety and standards in labs, then I drop the "conspiracy" part. Most, however, continue on about China, bioweapons, or "MSM propaganda," which 100% is conspiracy.
-
Yeah, this is a real issue. Gain-of-function virus research in particular is playing with fire.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I go back and forth on it a lot. I'm inclined to think regular zoonosis is more likely but I'm really not sure anymore
-
I just don’t think lab leak proponents really help themselves when their reason evidence hasn’t come to light involves accusations of malfeasance of multiple people and institutions. People asking for fair, transparent investigations are ok, but people go way far out
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.