If you aren't the best in the world at what you write about, you should not have a strictly paid newsletter. You are better off using a newsletter as your top of funnel to drive people to other monetization opportunities.
Show this thread
-
You could argue that they both serve different audiences and are best in the world for their audience. I think the point is about direct monetization of a newsletter versus indirect monetization.
Forget the newsletter part. Who cares what the medium is. If people are happy to pay and like the product, who the hell cares how you rank as best in the world. It’s a stupid, fluffy and unrealistic generalization.
-
-
We’re on a different topic then.
-
Why does only charge via newsletter if you’re the best matter vs only charge in the form of a course or other medium? It’s arbitrary to say newsletter vs podcast vs database vs tv show.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Agreed. The statement completely disregards the basics principles of value/price.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.